The persistent and deeply entrenched Israel-Palestine conflict has been a subject of extensive global concern, characterized by its complexity, historical roots, and geopolitical entanglements. A recent conversation between Dr. Qamar Cheema and Barrister Hamid Bashani at NHS Media shed light on the nature of this conflict and the role of the Muslim world, offering critical insights and analysis.
Key Points:
- The Israel Palestine is not primarily rooted in religious differences but rather in a complex web of historical, political, and territorial nuances.
- Political entities leverage the conflict for personal gains, and there is a noted failure of influential Muslim countries and global bodies in addressing and resolving the issue.
- International bodies’ limitations, such as the UN’s inability to address condemnations against both parties involved, hinder effective conflict resolution.
- There is a need for a more balanced approach by countries involved in the conflict. Diplomatic engagement, logical reasoning, and a reevaluation of the global power structure, particularly in the context of major powers wielding veto powers, are necessary for potential conflict resolution.
These highlights accentuate the misrepresentation of the conflict, the failures at the international level, and the necessity for a more diplomatic and balanced approach to address the complexities of the Israel-Palestine conflict.
Barrister Hamid Bashani notably emphasized that the conflict between Israel and Palestine is often misrepresented as a religious dispute. Bashani argued that the conflict is not fundamentally about religious differences between Jews and Muslims, as is often portrayed. Instead, he highlighted the intricate history of the division, handling, and dismantling of the region. This historical context underscores that the conflict’s roots are not inherently religious but rather a result of multifaceted political and territorial complexities.
He emphasized the exploitation of the ongoing conflict by political entities for personal gains. Bashani specifically pointed out that the situation has persisted since 1975, highlighting the inattention and lack of effective action from influential Muslim countries and leaders to resolve the matter.
Moreover, the limitations of international bodies like the United Nations in resolving the conflict were stressed. The veto power wielded by influential nations, coupled with the failure to address condemnations against both parties involved, has hindered effective conflict resolution.
Bashani underscored the importance of engaging with the international community based on logical reasoning rather than resorting to ineffective protests. He stressed the need for a balanced approach from countries like Pakistan to address the conflict, advocating for a constructive dialogue instead of engaging in futile activities that benefit extremist factions.
The conversation highlighted the prevalent world order reflected by the United Nations and its ineffectiveness due to the veto power held by major nations. Bashani also emphasized the need for a reevaluation of the Security Council’s structure and the prevailing power dynamics, which hinder effective conflict resolution and global balance.
Dr. Qamar Cheema and Barrister Hamid Bashani concurred on the conflict’s nature, stressing that it is more of a political issue concerning the independence and freedom of the involved nations rather than a religious conflict. The ongoing pattern of success for Israel in the conflict was attributed to strong leadership and international support.
Barrister Hamid Bashani provided a deeper understanding of the Israel-Palestine conflict, highlighting the need for diplomatic engagement, a reevaluation of the global power structure, and a reorientation of the conflict beyond religious connotations.
He stressed that the call for a nuanced approach, steering away from religious exploitation, and engaging in productive diplomacy for conflict resolution remains a pertinent subject, not just for the directly involved parties but also for the international community at large.
