In a recent conversation held by NHS Media, Professor Dr. Muqtadeer Khan provided insights into two pressing matters: China’s new map and the nuances of the G20 summit. The discussion revolved around the timeline of China’s map release, the impact on India, and the evolving dynamics in the region.
Key Points:
- China’s new map aroused questions about whether it was released before or after the BRICS Summit. The lack of clarity on the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and India’s differing maps added complexity to the situation.
- India’s efforts to seek diplomatic support from influential countries such as the United States and G7 nations to challenge China’s map. This pursuit reflects the importance of international alliances in addressing geopolitical issues.
- India’s response to China’s aggression, including its alignment with the QUAD and Western containment policies, represents a significant shift in its foreign policy. This shift is pushing India away from its historical ally, Russia.
One of the focal points of the conversation was the timeline of China’s new map. Dr. Muqtadeer Khan questioned whether this decision was made before or after the BRICS Summit, emphasizing the lack of information about the dialogue between President Xi Jinping and Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The challenge presented by the dialogue were twofold: it didn’t freeze the Line of Actual Control (LAC), and it failed to provide a clear vision of where the LAC precisely exists.
Dr. Khan highlighted the possibility that if China released the map after the BRICS Summit, it could be viewed positively as an opening for negotiations. India, in response, could argue that the map does not accurately represent its borders, setting the stage for a productive negotiation process. However, India faces an uphill battle, as the map it draws is not recognized by the United States or Western countries.
A significant aspect discussed was India’s pursuit of support from the United States and the G7 countries to challenge China’s map. If successful, this could be a diplomatic victory for India and add complexity to G20 discussions. The timing of China’s map release will likely dominate the discourse, potentially creating tension until negotiations are initiated.
Regarding the G20 Summit and the recent meeting between Xi Jinping and Narendra Modi in South Africa, Dr. Muqtadeer Khan noted that while significant progress was not achieved, there was an optimistic tone to the discussions. Both leaders expressed a commitment to resolve the border issue, though the focus shifted to who initiated the meeting, rather than the meeting’s content. India’s stance remains clear: stable borders are essential for improved relations.
The discussion delved into how India’s response to China’s aggression, including the banning of laptop imports, is pushing it away from its strategic autonomy policy. India’s alignment with the QUAD and Western containment policies against China represents a significant shift in its foreign policy, distancing itself from a long-standing ally, Russia.
Dr. Khan highlighted the significance of countries like Singapore, Malaysia, and ASEAN nations in Japan’s strategy. These countries maintain close ties with China, with the ASEAN bloc generally favoring China over the US. This stance has led to Indonesia’s exclusion from the QUAD alliance. Japan’s decision to double its defense spending is driven by the need to consolidate its position in the region, focusing on defense capabilities rather than offensive ones.
The conversation touched upon the increasing tensions between the US and China, particularly the weaponization of Taiwan. These developments are expected to challenge China’s position in the future and further complicate the geopolitical landscape. As India navigates its shifting alliances and strategic priorities, the balance of power in the region remains a critical factor in shaping the global order.